Wel­come to
www.theorderofthought.com

This web­site is to com­ple­ment a book being writ­ten
with the same title:
“The Order of Thought”.

To find out more about the book,
please visit the About the Book sec­tion of the website…

If you would like to con­tact the author,
you can do that here…

It has become some­what fash­ion­able in recent years to begin dis­cus­sion of just about any topic by stat­ing that we are liv­ing in revolu­tion­ary times.

Even annu­ally updated consumer-electronic items get described as revolu­tion­ary. How­ever, there is little con­sensus about the actual scope and nature of the revolu­tion com­ing, or the revolu­tion already upon us. Is this unfold­ing revolu­tion really to do with advances in tech­no­logy? Is it to do with over­pop­u­la­tion, or with aging pop­u­la­tions? Is it to do with the fin­an­cial sys­tem, or the eco­lo­gical crisis? Is it to do with a crisis in edu­ca­tion, or with a rising, global middle-class; or increas­ingly author­it­at­ive cent­ral­ised powers…?

In this book I will argue that the source of the revolu­tion tak­ing place in the fab­ric of human real­ity is to be found much “deeper”, as it were, than any of the above and sim­ilar wide ran­ging issues and changes people gen­er­ally might think of.

Put simply,
the revolu­tion of our time is the revolu­tion in thought*.

TheOrderofT: 'The illusion of the continuity of "the self" inevitably distorts perception, which in turn negates the possibility of intelligent action.'
TheOrderofT: 'Due to fragmentation, the process of autobiographical memory — fundamental to consciousness as we know it — lacks continuity.' TOoT
TheOrderofT: 'Just as we are able to identify processes essential for the #appearance of rainbows, we are able to identify processes behind "the self".'
TheOrderofT: 'Fragmentation in memory is the primary reason why there isn't an actual order of succession behind the apparent continuity of "the self".'
TheOrderofT: 'If the existence (inc., continuity) of self is already but an illusion, what is the meaning and significance of death?' - TOoT
TheOrderofT: 'The apparent continuity of the self is dependent on responses of memory: The supposedly incorporeal depends on a material process.' -TOoT
TheOrderofT: 'Any experience through or in terms of the self first and foremost indicates a particular level of subtlety of perception.' - TOoT
TheOrderofT: '"Relationships" centred around interplays of habitual responses can be neither harmonious nor coherent.' - TOoT
TheOrderofT: 'The continuity of 'self' is the continuity of habitual responses. Such continuity is antithetical to a creative way of living.' - TOoT
TheOrderofT: 'Imagination is often overvalued: U can imagine all U like what may happen but imagination alone won't even help U cross the road.' - TOoT
TheOrderofT: 'A creative act doesn't necessarily mean more addition or accumulation. A move from presence to absence can also be creative.' - TOoT
TheOrderofT: 'Imagination is like a 2D plane - capable of infinite extension, yet obviously limited when viewed from a "higher" dimension.' TOoT
TheOrderofT: 'Everything in thought is limited: "X" is "this" but not "that". It's clearly incoherent to give unlimited value to anything limited.' TOoT
TheOrderofT: 'The ubiquitousness of "blind" responses of memory in all aspects of our consciousness denies creative contact with what is actual.' - TOoT